Thrifty Banker
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Business
  • World
  • Investing

Thrifty Banker

Politics

Judge in Trump classified docs case grants Jack Smith request to redact witness names

by April 11, 2024
April 11, 2024
Judge in Trump classified docs case grants Jack Smith request to redact witness names

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon on Tuesday relented to special counsel Jack Smith in a long-running dispute over the names of government witnesses in the classified documents case against former President Trump, agreeing to shield their identities from the public eye. 

Cannon only partially granted prosecutors’ request in agreeing to keep the names of FBI agents, Secret Service agents and other potential witnesses in the case under seal. In a 24-page order, the judge refused to categorically block witness statements from being disclosed, saying there was no basis for such a ‘sweeping’ and ‘blanket’ restriction on their inclusion in pretrial motions. 

Cannon rejected a request by Smith’s team to seal from pretrial motions the substance of all witness statements, except for information that could be used to identify witnesses.

‘As for legal authority, the cases cited in the Special Counsel’s papers do not lend support to this sweeping request; nor do they appear to have been offered as such,’ Cannon wrote. ‘And based on the Court’s independent research, granting this request would be unprecedented: the Court cannot locate any case — high-profile or otherwise — in which a court has authorized anything remotely similar to the sweeping relief sought here.’

The disagreement between Smith’s team and lawyers for Trump, which had been pending for weeks, was one of many that had piled up before Cannon and had slowed the pace of the case against Trump. Tuesday’s order was the second time this month that Cannon was critical of Justice Department prosecutors, yet the judge still ruled mostly in their favor, The Washington Post reported.

The case remains without a firm trial date, though both sides have said they could be ready this summer. 

Cannon, who earlier decided to grant Trump’s request for an independent arbiter to review documents obtained during an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, made clear her continued skepticism of the DOJ theory of prosecution, saying Tuesday that the case raised ‘still-developing and somewhat muddled questions.’

In reconsidering an earlier order and siding with prosecutors on the protection of witness identities, Cannon likely averted a dramatic exacerbation of tensions with Smith’s team, which last week called a separate order from the judge ‘fundamentally flawed,’ according to The Associated Press. 

The issue surfaced in January when defense lawyers filed in partially redacted form a motion that sought to require prosecutors to turn over a trove of documents that they said would bolster their claim that the Biden administration had sought to ‘weaponize’ the government in charging Trump.

Defense lawyers asked permission to file the motion, which included as attachments information that they had obtained from prosecutors, in mostly unredacted form. However, prosecutors objected to unsealing the motion to the extent that it would reveal the identity of any potential government witness.

Cannon then granted the defense’s request for the motion and its exhibits to be filed in unredacted form as long as the personal identifying information of witnesses remained sealed. Smith’s team asked her to reconsider, saying that witnesses could be exposed to threats and harassments if publicly identified.

In agreeing on Tuesday for the witness names to remain redacted, she wrote, ‘Although the record is clear that the Special Counsel could have, and should have, raised its current arguments previously, the Court elects, upon a full review of those newly raised arguments, to reconsider its prior Order.’

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump lashes out at former VP Pence who criticized his lukewarm abortion statement
next post
South Korea’s prime minister and top presidential officials resign en masse

Related Posts

Trump seeks to delay federal election case until...

August 18, 2023

Trump starts 2024 in ‘strongest possible position’ in...

January 3, 2024

AOC lauds pro-Palestinian ‘activism,’ accuses US of aiding...

November 29, 2023

Palestinian gunmen fire on motorists in West Bank,...

February 23, 2024

Mike Pence reacts to Trump’s apparent ‘confused’ comments...

September 18, 2023

Biden admin sent millions to Hamas-linked UNRWA after...

February 3, 2024

Progressive senator backs potential ICC arrest warrant for...

May 21, 2024

Coca-Cola quietly deletes language supporting BLM after Ted...

October 21, 2023

Not since 1892: Trump vs Biden 2024 will...

January 30, 2024

Marine industry files lawsuit challenging legality of federal...

September 14, 2023

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 10 Countries for Natural Gas Production (Updated 2024)

      April 6, 2024
    • 2

      Five-foot Toy Story 3 bear draws the crowds at Costco’s first store in ‘China’s Silicon Valley’

      January 15, 2024
    • 3

      A GOP operative accused a monastery of voter fraud. Nuns fought back.

      January 3, 2025
    • 4

      Multiple New Multi-Commodity Targets

      May 12, 2025
    • 5

      New York Dem backtracks after calling for Trump to be ‘eliminated’

      November 21, 2023
    • 6

      Acceleration of RAD204 Phase 1 dose escalation trial

      May 12, 2025
    • 7

      Top 10 Tungsten-p​roducing Countries (Updated 2024)

      May 15, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,004)
    • Investing (2,012)
    • Politics (2,977)
    • Uncategorized (20)
    • World (3,305)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: thriftybanker.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thriftybanker.com | All Rights Reserved