Breaking
Thrifty Banker
Author

admin

Browsing
Investing

Walker Lane Announces Board Update

Investing 7 Mins Read

TSX-V: WLR

Frankfurt: 6YL

 Walker Lane Resources Ltd. (TSXV: WLR,OTC:CMCXF) (Frankfurt: 6YL) ‘Walker Lane’) announces the resignation of John Land as a Director of the Company and the appointment of Mr. Kevin Brewer, Director and CEO as interim Chairman of the Board.

The Board wishes to thank Mr. Land for his significant contribution to the Company. 

About Walker Lane Resources Ltd.

Walker Lane Resources Ltd. is a growth-stage exploration company focused on the exploration of high-grade gold, silver and polymetallic deposits in the Walker Lane Gold Trend District in Nevada and the Rancheria Silver District in Yukon/B.C. and other property assets in Yukon. The Company intends to initiate an aggressive exploration program to advance the Tule Canyon (Walker Lane, Nevada) and Amy (Rancheria Silver District, B.C.) projects through drilling programs with the aim of achieving resource definition in the near future.

On behalf of the Board:
‘Kevin Brewer’
Kevin Brewer, President, CEO and Director
Walker Lane Resources Ltd.

Cautionary and Forward Looking Statements

This press release and related figures, contain certain forward-looking information and forward-looking statements as defined in applicable securities laws (collectively referred to as forward-looking statements). These statements relate to future events or our future performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. The use of any of the words ‘anticipate’, ‘plans’, ‘continue’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘predict’, ‘potential’, ‘should’, ‘believe’ ‘targeted’, ‘can’, ‘anticipates’, ‘intends’, ‘likely’, ‘should’, ‘could’ or grammatical variations thereof and similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this presentation. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: our strategy and priorities including certain statements included in this presentation are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Canadian securities laws, including statements regarding the Tule Canyon, Cambridge, Silver Mountain, and Shamrock Properties in Nevada (USA), and its properties including Silverknife and Amy properties in British Columbia, the Silver Hart, Blue Heaven and Logjam properties in Yukon and the Bridal Veil property in Newfoundland and Labrador all of which now comprise the mineral property assets of WLR. WLR has assumed other assets of CMC Metals Ltd. including common share holdings of North Bay Resources Inc. (OTC-US: NBRI) and all conditions and agreements pertaining to the sale of the Bishop mill gold processing facility and remain subject to the condition of the option of the Silverknife property with Coeur Mining Inc. (TSX:CDE). These forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current beliefs and are based on information currently available to the Company and assumptions the Company believes are reasonable. The Company has made various assumptions, including, among others, that: the historical information related to the Company’s properties is reliable; the Company’s operations are not disrupted or delayed by unusual geological or technical problems; the Company has the ability to explore the Company’s properties; the Company will be able to raise any necessary additional capital on reasonable terms to execute its business plan; the Company’s current corporate activities will proceed as expected; general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner; and budgeted costs and expenditures are and will continue to be accurate.

Actual results and developments may differ materially from results and developments discussed in the forward-looking statements as they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, including: public health threats; fluctuations in metals prices, price of consumed commodities and currency markets; future profitability of mining operations; access to personnel; results of exploration and development activities, accuracy of technical information; risks related to ownership of properties; risks related to mining operations; risks related to mineral resource figures being estimates based on interpretations and assumptions which may result in less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently anticipated; the interpretation of drilling results and other geological data; receipt, maintenance and security of permits and mineral property titles; environmental and other regulatory risks; changes in operating expenses; changes in general market and industry conditions; changes in legal or regulatory requirements; other risk factors set out in this presentation; and other risk factors set out in the Company’s public disclosure documents. Although the Company has attempted to identify significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, there may be other risks that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Certain of these risks and uncertainties are beyond the Company’s control. Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements are qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no assurances that the actual results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences or benefits to, or effect on, the Company.

The information contained in this presentation is derived from management of the Company and otherwise from publicly available information and does not purport to contain all of the information that an investor may desire to have in evaluating the Company. The information has not been independently verified, may prove to be imprecise, and is subject to material updating, revision and further amendment. While management is not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented herein, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of the Company as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation and no responsibility or liability is accepted by any person for such information or opinions. The forward-looking statements and information in this presentation speak only as of the date of this presentation and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by applicable law. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Because of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions contained herein, prospective investors should not read forward-looking information as guarantees of future performance or results and should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Nothing in this presentation is, or should be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to the future. To the extent any forward-looking statement in this presentation constitutes ‘future-oriented financial information’ or ‘financial outlooks’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws, such information is being provided to demonstrate the anticipated market penetration and the reader is cautioned that this information may not be appropriate for any other purpose and the reader should not place undue reliance on such future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks. Future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks, as with forward-looking statements generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions and subject to the risks set out above. The Company’s actual financial position and results of operations may differ materially from management’s current expectations and, as a result, the Company’s revenue and expenses. The Company’s financial projections were not prepared with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of International Financial Reporting Standards and have not been examined, reviewed or compiled by the Company’s accountants or auditors. The Company’s financial projections represent management’s estimates as of the dates indicated thereon.

SOURCE Walker Lane Resources Ltd

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2025/16/c7861.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
Investing

Trump Weighs Executive Order to Loosen Federal Cannabis Restrictions

Investing 4 Mins Read

US President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing a major shift in federal drug policy that would relax decades-old restrictions on cannabis, potentially injecting new life into the industry.

Six people familiar with the discussions told the Washington Post that Trump is preparing an executive order directing federal agencies to pursue the reclassification of cannabis from a Schedule I substance to Schedule III.

The effort, still under internal review, was the focus of a December 10 phone call between Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, several of the sources said. Joining the call were cannabis industry executives, Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Mehmet Oz, administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the meeting publicly.

Johnson reportedly expressed skepticism and laid out several studies and data points opposing rescheduling, but by the end of the call, Trump appeared inclined to proceed. However, the sources emphasized that no final decision has been made and that he could still change course; this was later confirmed by another White House official.

Reclassification would shift cannabis from Schedule I status — reserved for substances deemed to have high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use — to Schedule III, which includes Tylenol with codeine and certain steroids.

The shift would not legalize recreational use under federal law, but would remove some of the most onerous constraints faced by medical researchers and by companies operating legally in dozens of states.

“This would be the biggest reform in federal cannabis policy since marijuana was made a Schedule I drug in the 1970s,” said Shane Pennington, a DC attorney who represents companies involved in rescheduling litigation.

He noted that while Trump cannot unilaterally change the drug schedule, he can instruct the Department of Justice to bypass a pending administrative hearing and finalize the rule.

The political backdrop has shifted sharply in recent years. Cannabis is legal for medical use in most states and for recreational use in 24, and has become a multibillion-dollar industry. Both Democrats and Republicans have expressed interest in rescheduling even as broader legalization remains deeply contested at the federal level.

For cannabis businesses, reclassification would be economically transformative.

Current tax rules prohibit companies that sell Schedule I substances from deducting ordinary business expenses, a barrier that industry representatives have long described as crushing.

“This monumental change will have a massive, positive effect on thousands of state-legal cannabis businesses around the country,” said Brian Vicente, founding partner at Vicente. “Rescheduling releases cannabis businesses from the crippling tax burden they have been shackled with and allows these businesses to grow and prosper.”

Policy advocates say the move would eliminate a central pillar of the federal government’s 50 year prohibition regime, while also highlighting how much work remains.

“This is the beginning of a new era of public health policy,” said Shawn Hauser, also a partner at Vicente.

She called the directive “a long-overdue acknowledgment of marijuana’s medical value and safety,” while warning that rescheduling alone will not resolve broader regulatory inconsistencies or criminal justice disparities.

Trump, who said in August that he was “looking at reclassification,” inherited a stalled proposal originally launched by then-President Joe Biden that recommended moving cannabis to Schedule III.

Rescheduling’s origins trace back to October 2022, when Biden instructed the Department of Health and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to review whether the current classification for cannabis is scientifically justified.

Health officials concluded in 2023 that it is not, prompting the DEA to propose shifting cannabis to Schedule III in early 2024. The proposed rule has been frozen since March 2025.

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
Politics

Brian Glenn reveals engagement to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene: ‘She said ‘yes”

Politics 1 Min Read

Real America’s Voice chief White House correspondent Brian Glenn and outgoing Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia revealed that they are engaged.

‘She said ‘yes’’ Glenn wrote in a post on X, adding the ring emoji while sharing a photo of himself with the congresswoman.

Greene shared Glenn’s post and wrote, ‘Happily ever after!!!’ along with a red heart emoji. ‘I love you @brianglenntv!!!’ she added.

‘Congratulations!’ Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio replied to both of the posts.

GOP Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee shared Glenn’s post and wrote, ‘Congratulations! I can perform the ceremony in Tennessee for free.’

After President Donald Trump trashed Greene on Truth Social last month and suggested he would back a primary challenger, the lawmaker announced that she would resign from office, noting that her last day will be January 5.

Greene, who has served in the House of Representatives since 2021, will be leaving office in the middle of her third term.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Keep Reading
Politics

Ex-Trump DHS official sounds alarm over national security threat within critical US industry

Politics 3 Mins Read

President Donald Trump’s former Secretary of Homeland Security, Chad Wolf, is sounding the alarm about China infiltrating America’s healthcare systems. 

Concern about China’s ability to infiltrate United States technology was underscored by a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed last week between four state attorneys general and Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, aimed at ramping up protections against Chinese infiltration of communications equipment and services utilized by the United States. 

On Monday, the Protecting America Initiative (PAI), a conservative nonprofit aimed at fighting the Chinese Communist Party’s efforts ‘to sabotage America,’ launched a campaign to highlight the nation’s vulnerability to China as it relates to medical technology. 

Earlier this year, both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) both warned of a ‘backdoor’ in a popular brand of patient monitoring devices. CISA found the so-called backdoor allowed the device to download remote files and send them to an IP address associated with a Chinese university. All schools in China operate under a law requiring them to support national intelligence work when called upon.

‘Americans rely on their doctors who take an oath to keep us safe, and first, do no harm. But when critical medical devices are made by Chinese companies, that puts our safety at risk. Chinese medical devices open the door for the CCP to access sensitive health data. President Trump and his administration always put America First and will safeguard our patients and our privacy from Beijing’s infiltration,’ PAI Senior Advisor Chad Wolf told Fox News Digital. ‘It’s time to remove Chinese medical devices from U.S. hospitals and close the data backdoor, because patient privacy and national security are non‑negotiable.’

In June, Florida’s Republican Attorney General James Uthmeier took legal action against the Chinese medical device manufacturers probed by the FDA and CISA, accusing the company of selling ‘compromised’ medical devices that allegedly include a ‘backdoor’ that bad actors can manipulate. 

In addition to patient data and privacy concerns, Uthmeier was also concerned about the medical device manufacturer, and those distributing its products, selling patient health monitors as approved by the FDA and other international standards, even though they were not.

 

China’s expanding presence in American medical supply chains has also been a concern among experts.

‘China’s growing role within the U.S. medical device supply chains is largely due to the combination of Beijing’s industrial policy and the shifting landscape of American healthcare,’ the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a conservative think tank in Washington, D.C. focusing on foreign affairs and national security, wrote in an October report.

‘The National Institute of Health (NIH) estimated that in 2019, 9.2 percent of U.S.-imported pharmaceuticals and medical equipment came from China — a percentage that ‘likely understates’ American reliance on China for medical products, NIH warned,’ the report continues. ‘This understatement is in part due to the complex nature of medical supply chains — China is both a supplier of raw materials used in medical products and the final point of assembly for goods bound for the United States, obscuring its reach into the American medical system. This percentage also does not account for the value-add or criticality of these goods, particularly those related to biodefense and managing long-term acute health issues.’

FDD claims that China has ‘exploited’ the United State’s ‘reliance’ on it by selling and exporting deliberately compromised technology, leading to doctors ‘unwittingly and unwillingly’ playing ‘Russian roulette with patient treatment plans.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Keep Reading
Politics

Senate advances $901B defense bill as Congress races into year-end legislative sprint

Politics 4 Mins Read

The Senate advanced the annual defense policy bill on an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote on Monday, teeing up final passage later in the week.

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2026 is one of the must-pass legislative packages that Congress deals with on an annual basis, and it unlocked billions of dollars in funding for the Pentagon and several other defense-related items.

Lawmakers pushed the colossal authorization package through a key procedural hurdle on a 76-20 vote. Senators will get their chance to tweak the package with several amendment votes in the coming days.

The roughly $901 billion package, which is about $8 billion over what President Donald Trump requested earlier this year, typically acts as a bookend for Congress, capping off the year as one of the few must-pass items on the docket. And, given that there is no government funding deadline to contend with, the NDAA is getting primetime treatment in the Senate.

Still, there are myriad items that lawmakers hope to tackle before leaving until the new year, including a fix to expiring Obamacare subsidies, confirming nearly 100 of Trump’s nominees, and a potential five-bill funding package that, if passed, would go a long way toward warding off the specter of another government shutdown come Jan. 30.

Scattered throughout the colossal package’s roughly 3,000 pages are several provisions dealing with decades-old war authorities, strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, Ukraine, lifting sanctions, and Washington, D.C.’s, airspace.

This year’s NDAA would scrap the 1991 and 2002 authorizations of use of military force (AUMFs) for the Gulf War and Iraq War, respectively. Lawmakers have found rare bipartisan middle ground in their desire to nix the AUMFs, which have been used by previous administrations to engage in conflicts in the Middle East for decades.

Then there is a policy that includes several requirements to fulfill the Pentagon’s travel budget, one of which would force the agency to hand over all unedited footage from the Trump administration’s strikes against alleged drug boats.

It’s a pointed provision that underscores the bipartisan concern from Congress over the administration’s handling of the strikes, particularly in the wake of a double-tap strike on Sept. 2 that has seen several lawmakers demand more transparency and access to the footage.

There is also a provision that has stirred up controversy among Senate Republicans and Democrats alike that would roll back some safety standards in the Washington, D.C., airspace. It comes on the heels of the collision between a Black Hawk helicopter and passenger jet near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport earlier this year.

Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Chair Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., the top ranking Democrat on the panel, are pushing to have the provision stripped with their own amendment, which would codify the safety tweaks made after the midair collision.

Cruz said alongside family members of the victims of the crash, which killed 67, that the provision didn’t go through the ordinary clearances.’ 

‘Normally, when you’re adding a provision to the NDAA that impacts aviation, you would request clearance from the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee,’ Cruz said. ‘No clearance was requested. We discovered this provision when the final version of the bill dropped out of the House and it was passed.’

There are also several provisions that deal with Ukraine, including an extension of the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which would authorize $400 million each year to buy weapons from U.S. defense companies.

There’s a provision that would prevent the U.S. from quietly cutting off intelligence support to the country by requiring at least 48-hours notice detailing why, how long it would last and the impact on Ukraine.

There’s also a provision that would beef up reporting requirements for all foreign aid flowing to Ukraine from the U.S. and other allies supporting the country in its conflict with Russia.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Keep Reading
Politics

‘Ghost ships’ ferrying illicit oil have sailed into Trump’s crosshairs

Politics 3 Mins Read

After the U.S. seized a tanker carrying Venezuelan crude oil, the shadowy fleet of ‘ghost ships’ used to evade sanctions drifted squarely into President Donald Trump’s crosshairs.

On Dec. 10, Trump announced the seizure of the ‘Skipper,’ a vessel that secretly ferries oil in defiance of sanctions. 

The broader fleet, a clandestine armada of roughly 1,000 tankers, quietly navigates global sea routes to move oil from sanctioned countries like Russia, Iran and Venezuela.

The so-called ‘ghost ships’ sail under foreign flags to obscure their origins, repeatedly change names, shift ownership through shell companies, disable transponders to evade tracking and conduct mid-sea transfers to mask their cargo.

The result is a labyrinthine system of handoffs and disguised voyages.

Benjamin Jensen, who heads the Futures Lab at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the challenge extends well beyond Venezuela.

‘I do think it’s time that the United States and other countries start to address what really is a global problem,’ explained Benjamin Jensen, director of the Futures Lab at the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Jensen said the seizure sends a shock not just to Caracas but to other actors as well. 

‘What we don’t know is how they’re following that up behind the scenes,’ he said, adding that further seizures under Trump are possible.

With Venezuela’s economy tethered almost entirely to oil revenue, he noted that even a single interdiction can have an outsized impact. 

‘Anything you do that puts pressure on their ability to bypass sanctions and trade in oil is a direct threat to the economy and, by extension, the regime,’ he said. 

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has signaled that the seizure of the ‘Skipper’ is only the opening salvo in a new effort to cut off the oil revenues that keep Moscow, Tehran and Caracas afloat.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that the vessel is ‘undergoing a forfeiture process.’

‘Right now, the United States currently has a full investigative team on the ground, on the vessel and individuals on board the vessel are being interviewed, and any relevant evidence is being seized,’ Leavitt said, adding that the U.S. will take hold of the oil after the legal process is completed.

The move comes as China continues to be the leading importer of Iranian oil and the second-largest buyer of Russian crude, much of it routed through a growing fleet of nondescript tankers evading U.S. sanctions.

Earlier this year, the 19-year-old crude oil tanker named ‘Eventin’ was seized by German authorities after the ship suffered engine failure in the Baltic Sea. The vessel was previously identified as a ship that exports Russian crude oil and other petroleum products.

German authorities discovered that the Panama-flagged vessel, which was previously named Charvi and Storviken, was carrying 99,000 tons, or approximately $45 million worth, of Russian oil.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Keep Reading
Investing

Locksley Resources LimitedLt. Gen.Schwartz to Advance US Defense Strategy

Investing 6 Mins Read

Perth, Australia (ABN Newswire) – Locksley Resources Limited (ASX:LKY,OTC:LKYRF) (FRA:X5L) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) announced the appointment of Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz as Strategic Advisor – U.S. Government Initiatives, strengthening the Company’s engagement across U.S. defense, national security, and federal funding programs.

HIGHLIGHTS

– Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz appointed as Strategic Advisor to advance U.S. Government Initiatives

– Brings 33+ years of senior U.S. military leadership, including JSOC, SOCOM-Europe and U.S. Security Coordinator roles

– Appointment of new strategic advisor supports Locksley’s pursuit of DPA Title III, DoD, and DOE funding pathways for critical mineral onshoring

– Provides strategic guidance on integrating Locksley’s antimony supply into defence, aerospace, and prime contractor applications

– Enhances Locksley’s standing within U.S. national security circles during a period of heightened focus on reducing Chinese dependency for critical minerals

– Appointment supports Locksley’s positioning of the Desert Antimony Project as an immediate and credible U.S. supply solution

– Appointment of Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz reinforces ‘Locksley’s U.S Mine to Market’ strategy, targeting production of ingots, trisulphide, trioxide, and other downstream defence-grade products

Lieutenant General Schwartz served more than 33 years in the U.S. Army, including senior leadership roles as:

– U.S. Security Coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Authority

– Commander, Special Operations Command – Europe

– Deputy Commanding General, Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)

– Deputy Commander, Special Operations Joint Task Force Afghanistan

Experience Directly Aligned with U.S. Critical Minerals Priorities:

– Oversaw complex bilateral and multilateral security operations, including U.S. coordination with allied forces across the Middle East and Europe, ensuring integrated strategic planning and operational readiness

– Led major U.S. strategic assistance, force readiness, and interoperability programs, providing experience directly relevant to the United States’ efforts to secure domestic supply chains and strengthen critical minerals resilience His career has centered on advancing U.S. national security interests, joint force readiness, and strategic operations.

Experience Aligned with the Strategic Role:

As Strategic Advisor, Lieutenant General Schwartz will support Locksley’s U.S. government engagement strategy, specifically:

– Advancing Locksley’s DPA Title III and related Department of Defense and Department of Energy funding pathways;

– Supporting Locksley’s positioning within the National Defense Stockpile framework for antimony and other critical minerals;

– Providing strategic guidance on U.S. initiatives to onshore or friend-shore critical mineral supply chains;

– Supporting downstream integration of Locksley’s antimony products into defence, aerospace, and prime-contractor applications, including trisulphide, alloys, and other strategic materials.

His appointment directly complements Locksley’s progress toward establishing the United States’ first modern, integrated Mine-to-Market antimony supply chain.

Lieutenant General (Ret.) Mark C. Schwartz commented:

‘Throughout my career, my purpose has been to lead and protect U.S. national security interests across the globe. Today, one of the most significant strategic vulnerabilities facing the United States is our reliance on foreign often adversarial sources of critical minerals.

Onshoring and friend-shoring materials like antimony is essential for U.S. military readiness, industrial resilience, and protection against coercive threats, including the risk of China cutting off supply.

I look forward to working with Locksley to further articulate the importance of their antimony project, and to accelerate the immediate opportunities it presents for strengthening America’s defence and strategic materials base.’

Kerrie Matthews, Managing Director & CEO, commented:

‘Lieutenant General Schwartz brings unparalleled strategic insight into U.S defense operations and national security frameworks. His experience in operating at the highest levels of U.S. defense and government and allied commence will significantly strengthen Locksley’s engagement across defense, aerospace and strategic materials sector.

His appointment will materially strengthen our engagement across federal departments, funding agencies, and prime defence contractors at a time when the U.S. is prioritising secure domestic supply of critical minerals. This expertise will be invaluable as Locksley advances it integrated Mine to Market strategy.’

Strategic Context:

The appointment comes at a time when the United States is rapidly accelerating efforts to rebuild domestic capability in critical minerals through programs such as DPA Title III, the Industrial Base Expansion program, the National Defense Stockpile Modernization initiative, and emerging federal procurement pathways for strategic materials. These initiatives collectively represent one of the largest U.S Government commitments to critical minerals, one of the largest Lieutenant General Schwartz’s expertise will support Locksley in navigating these programs as the Company advances its ‘U.S Mine to Market’ strategy for antimony.

About Locksley Resources Limited:

Locksley Resources Limited (ASX:LKY,OTC:LKYRF) (FRA:X5L) (OTCMKTS:LKYRF) is an ASX listed explorer focused on critical minerals in the United States of America. The Company is actively advancing exploration across two key assets: the Mojave Project in California, targeting rare earth elements (REEs) and antimony. Locksley Resources aims to generate shareholder value through strategic exploration, discovery and development in this highly prospective mineral region.

Mojave Project

Located in the Mojave Desert, California, the Mojave Project comprises over 250 claims across two contiguous prospect areas, namely, the North Block/Northeast Block and the El Campo Prospect. The North Block directly abuts claims held by MP Materials, while El Campo lies along strike of the Mountain Pass Mine and is enveloped by MP Materials’ claims, highlighting the strong geological continuity and exploration potential of the project area.

In addition to rare earths, the Mojave Project hosts the historic ‘Desert Antimony Mine’, which last operated in 1937. Despite the United States currently having no domestic antimony production, demand for the metal remains high due to its essential role in defense systems, semiconductors, and metal alloys. With significant surface sample results, the Desert Mine prospect represents one of the highest-grade known antimony occurrences in the U.S.

Locksley’s North American position is further strengthened by rising geopolitical urgency to diversify supply chains away from China, the global leader in both REE & antimony production. With its maiden drilling program planned, the Mojave Project is uniquely positioned to align with U.S. strategic objectives around critical mineral independence and economic security.

Tottenham Project

Locksley’s Australian portfolio comprises the advanced Tottenham Copper-Gold Project in New South Wales, focused on VMS-style mineralisation

Source:
Locksley Resources Limited

Contact:
Kerrie Matthews
Chief Executive Officer
Locksley Resources Limited
T: +61 8 9481 0389
Kerrie@locksleyresources.com.au

News Provided by ABN Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
Investing

Uranium Price Forecast: Top Trends for Uranium in 2026

Investing 10 Mins Read

2026 is poised to be transformative for uranium as tightening supply converges with robust demand from new reactor builds and life extensions, plus data center construction and a broader shift to clean energy.

Despite these tailwinds, the U3O8 spot price remained muted for most of 2025, locked between US$63 and US$83 per pound; meanwhile, long-term contracting prices spent the majority of the year inching incrementally higher.

For Justin Huhn of Uranium Insider, the long-term contracting price rise paired with a V-shaped recovery exhibited by equities during the second half of the year has set the stage for bullish growth.

“In the background, the long-term U3O8 price, the three year forward, the five year forward price are all moving up. In fact, the long-term price is up from US$80 to US$86 on the year. That’s a very nice move.”

He went on to explain that long-term uranium pricing usually goes through periods of stagnation, followed by strong upward moves. This trend can be seen in how the long-term price has performed over the last five to six years, with stagnation lasting between eight and 15 months before eight to 12 months of higher prices set in.

“As far as we can tell, we’re in month three of a higher move,” said Huhn.

“We think it’s going to breach US$90 and probably push US$100 on this move that will happen next year.”

With uranium still far from its 2016 bottom, he believes the sector “has a huge runway,” adding that small caps remain largely overlooked, but “will have their day” once the commodity itself finally breaks higher.

Strong reactor growth — not AI hype — to drive long-term demand

In 2024, worldwide uranium production met 90 percent of global demand, with the remaining 10 percent likely made up of stockpiled material. At the same time, global nuclear expansion is accelerating quickly, according to the latest World Nuclear Association outlook. From 398 gigawatts electric (GWe) of installed nuclear capacity this past June, the organization’s reference scenario shows capacity nearly doubling to 746 GWe by 2040.

More aggressive growth could push that figure to 966 GWe, while a slower buildout still reaches 552 GWe.

This rapid growth has major implications for uranium demand.

Reactors are expected to consume about 68,900 metric tons (MT) of uranium in 2025. By 2040, requirements will more than double to just over 150,000 MT in the reference case, and could exceed 204,000 MT in the high-growth scenario. Even the low case sees demand topping 107,000 MT, underscoring the sector’s long-term structural pull on supply.

On that note, Lobo Tiggre, CEO of IndependentSpeculator.com, cautioned investors not to lose sight of uranium’s core driver — dependable, round-the-clock electricity.

“The use case is baseload power,” he said. “There’s no substitution, and the world is building like gangbusters.”

He argued that data center construction and electric vehicle (EV) adoption are just an added boost, not the backbone, and that headlines about AI or data center growth may be distracting from the foundation of the uranium thesis.

“If the EV story completely went away, it wouldn’t undo the thesis for uranium,” Tiggre said. “It would remove a tailwind, not the base story.” And despite political noise in the US, he believes the global shift to EVs remains intact.

He sees AI demand as similar: a powerful tailwind that strengthens the case for nuclear, but doesn’t define it.

When asked how meaningful near-term demand from new reactors and extensions could be — and when utilities will need to accelerate contracting — Gerardo Del Real, publisher at Digest Publishing, didn’t hesitate.

“How material? Very material,” he said.

But he cautioned that utilities remain “the slowest actors, always,” even as long-term contract prices have climbed “US$8 to US$10 above spot.” That contract price, he noted, is the real signal to watch. Because fuel makes up such a small share of a utility’s total operating costs, “they can afford to sign at US$120 or even US$130,” he said — levels that are far more consequential for producers and developers than for reactors themselves.

While some utilities have begun stepping in at higher prices, Del Real said the aggressive contracting many expected a year ago still hasn’t materialized. “I don’t think we’ll really see that until 2026,” he said.

Del Real said the uranium market is being driven by a mix of fundamentals and sentiment, and right now, the psychological lift from the tech boom is hard to ignore. While he doubts every AI-era data center plan will be built, the expert argued that even partial follow-through could massively expand power demand. If tech companies deliver “35 to 50 percent of their promises,” Del Real said, the energy needs would be “absolutely spectacular.”

That surge would hit an already-tightening market. He noted that the uranium sector is on track for a major supply deficit by 2026, a shortfall that he now believes is accelerating.

This sentiment was reiterated by Huhn, who explained that while broader narratives like AI and data center growth have been loosely tied to uranium, they don’t fundamentally alter the thesis for rising prices.

“If we see CAPEX pull back and growth slow, could that narrative impact us? Absolutely. But once prices start moving, uranium will carve out its own story,” he said. In his view, the real driver is the de-risking of existing reactors.

‘So instead of data center demand quadrupling by 2030, if it only doubles, we’re still going to see the de-risking of the existing operating reactors of the world, in particular in the countries that have expansion of data centers, which is most of the modern countries, but especially in the US, especially in China.”

Looking ahead, Huhn stressed that while new US reactors could eventually boost fuel demand in the early 2030s, utilities are already securing long-term contracts today.

“So the market for those reactors exists now,” he said. “As we enter 2026, attention will be everywhere.”

Aging uranium mines threaten supply security

Global uranium production is expected to climb over the next decade, but is seen struggling to meet demand.

The Australian government’s latest Resources and Energy Quarterly report projects that world uranium supply will rise from roughly 78 million MT in 2024 to about 97,000 MT by 2030, fueled by output expansions in Kazakhstan, Canada, Morocco and Finland — a roughly 24 percent increase over six years.

Industry experts also forecast a modest compound annual growth rate of 4.1 percent through 2030, with output reaching around 76,800 MT, reflecting expansions at major producers, including Kazakhstan and Canada.

Yet beyond 2030, many existing mines are expected to plateau or decline unless new projects come online, highlighting the critical need for timely investment to meet the fuel demands of the world’s growing nuclear fleet.

Future supply was a concern raised by Huhn, who underscored the challenges inherent in uranium mining.

“Mining is hard,” he said, pointing to Cameco’s (TSX:CCO,NYSE:CCJ) struggles at MacArthur River as it transitions to a new phase of the mine. The company has experienced mill downtime and production setbacks, yet still aims to deliver 15 million pounds of uranium in 2025, down from its typical 18 million. “These are very complicated underground mines with high-grade ore,” Huhn noted, emphasizing the operational complexity.

Huhn also highlighted long-term concerns: “Cigar Lake will be offline in 10 years, MacArthur River in 15. The two biggest projects that the industry relies on are finite. They need replacements if they intend to stay in uranium mining.”

Regarding Kazatomprom, he said the company is adopting a “value over volume” approach, focusing on responsible management of legacy assets while balancing joint ventures with Russia and China.

However, many of its projects are expected to peak over the next five years, with steep decline rates looming in the 2030s. Huhn warned: “Both (major miners) have pipeline problems into the 2030s. Without new development, the market will struggle to balance supply with the surging demand ahead.”

To facilitate this growth, Huhn stressed that uranium prices will need to stay elevated to incentivize the capital expenditures required to meet long-term demand.

“Looking at what the world will need to supply 250 million to 300 million pounds a year in about 10 years, we’re probably going to need prices in the US$125 to US$150 range, and they’ll need to stay there for a while,” he said.

Huhn added that short-term spikes aren’t enough.

“A spike to US$200 and then falling back to US$100 doesn’t do much for the industry,” he explained, noting that commodities cycles tend to overshoot on both ends. “Even in past cycles, prices fell below production costs — like when spot was US$30 a pound, but most low-cost producers were at US$40 to US$50. When the market recovers, the upside is usually much higher than the incentive price.”

Bullish uranium outlook meets real risks

Tiggre sees a bursting AI bubble as a possible threat to uranium’s upward price movement.

“There’s going to be a lot of companies that blow up,” he said. “There’s a significant chance that we get a major market event based on the AI bubble popping, and there will be a lot of panic selling of everything related. And unfortunately, that’s going to smack uranium too, because it has become an AI play now.”

Tiggre believes an event like this would be a strong buying opportunity, and while he doesn’t want to see people impacted by bubble burst, he urged investors to be prepared.

“I’ll be gleefully in the market when it puts something on sale, something you know is valuable. When the market offers it at a discount, and nothing else has changed, that’s an absolute gift,’ he said.

‘Opportunities like that don’t come often. Fluctuations happen, but a genuine sale on something you want for all the right reasons — that’s what makes fortunes for those with the courage to act.”

For 2026, Huhn sees utilities as the key driver for uranium prices. “I’m really looking at the utilities more than anything in the physical market, because that dictates everything else,” he explained.

While uranium equities have drawn attention, including meme-stock-like surges, Huhn is focused on the underlying commodity. He also pointed to a standoff, noting that major uranium producers like Cameco are seeking market-reference contracts with high ceilings, signaling confidence in rising prices, while utilities — still adjusting from reactor restarts and long-term power agreements — are testing the waters with small tenders.

“(Producers) want market reference with ceilings at US$130 to US$140, so that should tell all of us where the biggest players in the industry believe the price is going,” said Huhn. “Once we see the big utilities step up and sign these large contracts at the prices producers want, then it’s game on,” he emphasized, predicting a rapid price reset that could potentially push uranium from around US$75 to US$100 over a few months.

Looking down the pipeline, Del Real said he’s keeping a close eye on junior uranium companies, which he believes offer some of the biggest upside in the sector.

“If you know the management teams and can access these deals early, you can do spectacularly well,” he said, citing his firm’s early investment in North Shore Uranium (TSXV:NSU) as an example.

While he acknowledged the high risk involved, Del Real argued that in the current volatile market, well-chosen juniors can rival larger producers in potential returns, particularly when strategic financing and timing align.

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading
Investing

FORTUNE BAY PROVIDES UPDATE ON POMA ROSA PROJECT, CHIAPAS STATE, MEXICO

Investing 6 Mins Read

Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV: FOR,OTC:FTBYF) (FWB: 5QN) (OTCQB: FTBYF) (‘Fortune Bay’ or the ‘Company’) provides an update regarding recent regulatory developments in the State of Chiapas, Mexico, that may affect the Company’s Rio Negro concession (Poma Rosa Project), held through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Linear Gold México, S.A. de C.V.

On November 19, 2025, the Government of the State of Chiapas published a decree establishing a state-level protected natural area known as the Zona Sujeta a Conservación Ecológica ‘Mina Banderas’, located in the Municipality of Pantepec. Based on recent review of the decree and associated mapping, a portion of the designated area overlaps with the Company’s Río Negro concession, which remains valid and in good standing under federal Mexican mining law. The overlapping area covers approximately 11% of the Rio Negro concession and includes a portion of the Campamento gold-silver deposit and other nearby exploration target areas.

The Company was recently made aware of the protected natural area and the potential implications to the Rio Negro concession, and in response has filed an amparo (constitutional challenge) before the appropriate federal court in Mexico. The amparo challenges the application of the Mina Banderas decree to the Río Negro concession on procedural and constitutional grounds, including matters relating to due process, consultation, and the interaction between state environmental measures and federally granted mining rights. The purpose of the amparo is to preserve the Company’s rights under its existing concession while the matter is reviewed by the court.

During 2025 the Company has made significant progress in advancing stakeholder engagement and support for the Poma Rosa Project, including substantive discussion and negotiation with local landowners regarding exploration agreements that would support the resumption of field-based exploration activities. Engagement to date has been conducted in a respectful and transparent manner and in compliance with applicable laws. As of the date of this release, the Company does not expect any immediate operational or financial impact beyond potential timing uncertainty.

Fortune Bay is working closely with Mexican legal counsel to assess the scope and implications of the decree and the amparo process. The Company will continue to monitor developments and will provide further updates as appropriate.

About Fortune Bay

Fortune Bay Corp. (TSXV:FOR,OTC:FTBYF; FWB:5QN; OTCQB:FTBYF) is a Canadian mineral exploration and development company with assets in Canada and Mexico. The Company’s primary focus is advancing the Goldfields Gold Project in Saskatchewan, Canada. Fortune Bay also holds the Poma Rosa Gold-Copper Project in Chiapas, Mexico, as well as an optioned uranium project portfolio in the Athabasca Basin of Saskatchewan. Fortune Bay continues to evaluate and advance its portfolio in a disciplined manner while maintaining a strong technical foundation and prudent capital management. For more information, please visit www.fortunebaycorp.com or contact info@fortunebaycorp.com.

On behalf of Fortune Bay Corp.

‘Dale Verran’
Chief Executive Officer
902-334-1919

Cautionary Statement

Information set forth in this news release contains forward-looking statements that are based on assumptions as of the date of this news release. These statements reflect management’s current estimates, beliefs, intentions, and expectations. They are not guarantees of future performance. Words such as ‘expects’, ‘aims’, ‘anticipates’, ‘targets’, ‘goals’, ‘projects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, ‘continues’, ‘may’, variations of such words, and similar expressions and references to future periods, are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, and include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: the results of the Updated PEA, including future Project opportunities, future operating and capital costs, closure costs, AISC, the projected NPV, IRR, timelines, permit timelines, and the ability to obtain the requisite permits, economics and associated returns of the Project, the technical viability of the Project, the market and future price of and demand for gold, the environmental impact of the Project, and the ongoing ability to work cooperatively with stakeholders, including Indigenous Nations, local Municipalities and local levels of government. Since forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and address future events and conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Although these statements are based on information currently available to the Company, the Company provides no assurance that actual results will meet management’s expectations. Risks, uncertainties and other factors involved with forward- looking information could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s objectives, goals or future plans, statements, exploration results, potential mineralization, the estimation of mineral resources, exploration and mine development plans, timing of the commencement of operations and estimates of market conditions. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to failure to identify mineral resources, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, the inability to complete a feasibility study which recommends a production decision, the preliminary nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, inability to fulfill the duty to accommodate Indigenous Nations and local Municipalities, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry, and those risks set out in the Company’s public documents filed on SEDAR. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law. For more information on Fortune Bay, readers should refer to Fortune Bay’s website at www.fortunebaycorp.com.

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

SOURCE Fortune Bay Corp.

View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/December2025/15/c5439.html

News Provided by Canada Newswire via QuoteMedia

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Keep Reading